”Second City CBD„
Auckland Councils to date have managed growth so poorly for so long that residents now view a growing population as a huge burden. And why wouldn’t they? The Auckland Council has squeezed additional houses into suburbs never designed for such levels of density. As a direct result, there’s an imminent threat to established communities and character neighbourhoods, as well as significant projected increases in congestion, overcrowding in schools and a compromised standard of living for everyone. It just doesn’t have to be this way.
We can move growth out of suburbs designed to be low density and into new areas designed for intensive development. We don’t have to change neighbourhoods that have developed over generations. Shifting the growth to new areas will not only avoid the need for expensive and inefficient retrofitting, it will maximise new investment that we know we are going to have to make anyway. We can save money and achieve a better outcome – for old residents and new.
Developing a Second CBD is more efficient, more sustainable, more sensible and more acceptable to existing residents
A new CBD-scale urban centre with living and employment is the most efficient approach to managing Auckland’s growth. Located near rail or bus way stations, a major new metropolitan centre will utilise existing transport investment, offsetting the requirement for big new spending. Using scale to leverage efficiencies, we can build more housing for less and deliver the water, energy and critical services residents need at the lowest possible cost. And by building from the ground up, in a new development area away from existing residents, we can roll out new buildings which meet modern expectations and standards faster and cheaper.
A second CBD is the most environmentally responsible approach to managing Auckland’s growth. We can make better use of the land by building up, reducing the pressure to expand out. Constructing a brand new city will allow the latest and most effective technologies to be delivered which minimise energy and water inefficiencies and help protect rural land, while providing the densities required to sustain efficient and effective public transport services.
A second CBD is the most sensible way to manage Auckland’s growth. Identifying a new brownfield or Greenfield site for major new development and then aligning Council policies to remove impediments to construction will expedite growth in that area. With well-timed investment, we can then phase new development so that residents move into the centre as infrastructure and other services become available. This will avoid the cost associated with idle and underutilised assets, make best use of resources in the short and long term, and incentivise development in an area with lower overall costs to the region.
A second CBD is the most publicly acceptable way to manage Auckland’s growth. New growth in Auckland is often viewed as a burden. That’s because the Council has handled it so poorly. New growth is an opportunity for new services, new living opportunities, new lifestyles, new activities and new futures. A second CDB delivers on this vision and doesn’t come at the expense of established communities. We can develop a new centre away from existing suburbs so that we do not intrude upon quiet, suburban environments and crowd out long standing character neighbourhoods.
Aligning Council policy in this way to facilitate and encourage private investment in housing, employment, amenities and services, we can create a vibrant new city in our region. A new city that is accessible to all Aucklanders takes pressure off established communities and delivers the best value for money to ratepayers.